SIR MASTER MARK  đź‡¨đź‡¦

Let ME address jealousy.

 FACT - The highest level in the hierarchy must be the MASTER/SIR.  

 Every true submissive wants to please their MASTER, and to make the MASTER happy. That should be the governing primary focus of any power exchange dynamic “relationship”.

I separate those who are in a “Power Dynamic Relationship” from those who are in a transactional BDSM/Dom/sub “event”. In a transactional event it is about the experience of the moment, where a relationship-based Power Exchange is a much higher level of power exchange which happens to include “the event”. That in MY opinion is the core of a POWER EXCHANGE, the primary focus and purpose of the relationship between a submissive and a MASTER/SIR.

 So “If” a boy/slave in My family were to be jealous about another member in the family, MY response would be.

 Why are you jealous?  

 You should be happy that your MASTER/SIR is getting what HE needs and is happy.  

 Does it matter who provides that happiness? 

 Is it not more important that the MASTER is happy?

 
Submission is not just because you are submissive but also because you need to please HIM, wish to please HIM, and it feels right to be controlled by the MAN you bow your head to, - your MASTER - that is a real POWER EXCHANGE.  

 As no one boy/slave can provide 100% of what a MASTER needs to make that MASTER/SIR happy, it would make sense that the MASTER/SIR have more than one submissive in service.

When there is jealousy, that means that the SIR/MASTER is secondary, and not the primary focus.  It appears then that the focus is about the slave/boy. That is ego, and ego does not belong in the submissive.  That Is not what the power exchange is supposed to be, it is fact conflict with the primary objective. 

Now jealousy is a valid human characteristic, and happens. It should be identified, discussed and resolved quickly, it does not belong in a Power Exchange Relationship. It is the responsibility of the MASTER/SIR to solve with the submissive.

Now comes the question, should a MASTER/SIR have activity with submissives who are not “in the family”, who are not “collared”?  ABSOUTELY they should, because for the MASTER/SIR to be happy, they must source all avenues that can make their lives better, and happier.  Again we come back to the Prime Directive.

A boy/slave who is collared has a different relationship with his MASTER/SIR than a submissive who is trying to get the attention of a MASTER. The collared one has position, and a place, the submissive is only transactional. 


Yes, one day, they both may be owned in the same family, and service their common MASTER/SIR as they are able to. Maybe separately, maybe together, as the MASTER/SIR may require, but what has not changed is the primary focus outlined at the beginning and the purpose of the Power Exchange Relationship.